Released in 1993 and directed by Steven Spielberg, Schindler’s List is a historical drama based on the true story of Oskar Schindler. The film won seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Original Score, and also received critical acclaim globally. Known for its stark black-and-white cinematography, it had a profound cultural impact, becoming a key work in Holocaust education. It not only raised awareness about the atrocities of the Holocaust but also sparked conversations about morality, human rights, and individual responsibility. Spielberg’s establishment of the USC Shoah Foundation, which archives survivor testimonies, further cemented the film’s legacy in preserving Holocaust history.
“Schindler’s List” explores profound themes surrounding the Holocaust, focusing on the tension between good and evil within individuals. It delves into the moral awakening of Oskar Schindler, a German businessman who initially exploits Jewish labor for profit but gradually transforms into a savior, risking everything to protect the lives of over a thousand Jews. The film examines the horrors of dehumanization, contrasting acts of cruelty with moments of compassion and solidarity. It reflects on the power of choice, showing how Schindler’s change in conscience disrupts the apathy that allowed atrocities to thrive. The narrative also addresses the fragility of humanity in times of war, exposing how systems of hatred and bureaucracy strip people of their dignity, yet also highlighting the resilience of the human spirit. Through Schindler’s arc, the story underscores the impact of individual actions amidst overwhelming darkness, leaving audiences to reflect on moral responsibility and the value of life.
Schindler’s List explores defensiveness and lack of empathy primarily through the behavior of key characters and the depiction of Nazi officers, as well as Oskar Schindler’s initial indifference toward the plight of the Jews. The film portrays how systemic cruelty is sustained by individuals who rationalize their actions, either through ideological justification or emotional detachment, illustrating the mechanisms that allow atrocities to occur.
Amon Goeth, the ruthless Nazi commandant, embodies the extreme lack of empathy. His sadistic treatment of the Jews—routinely shooting them from his balcony and administering brutal punishments—demonstrates how power, combined with dehumanization, numbs any sense of compassion. Goeth views the Jews not as individuals but as expendable labor, justifying his cruelty as necessary for efficiency. His defensiveness surfaces whenever he interacts with Schindler, particularly when his authority or belief in the Nazi system is questioned. This defensiveness prevents him from even considering the humanity of those he oppresses, trapping him in a cycle of violence.
Schindler himself starts as an opportunist driven by self-interest, with little empathy for the Jewish workers in his factory. Early in the film, he treats them as tools for profit, reflecting a passive complicity common during the Holocaust. However, as he witnesses the brutal liquidation of the Kraków ghetto and the suffering of the Jewish community, he slowly sheds his defensiveness. His transformation highlights the tension between self-preservation and moral responsibility—initially, he avoids emotional involvement, but over time, he can no longer ignore the reality around him. This personal growth serves as a counterpoint to characters like Goeth, showing how empathy, once embraced, becomes an active force against evil.
The broader Nazi regime depicted in the film also shows how lack of empathy is institutionalized through bureaucratic processes, where following orders becomes an excuse for avoiding moral accountability. Soldiers and officers justify their actions as necessary duties, insulating themselves from guilt by clinging to defensiveness, suppressing any instinct to empathize with their victims. The film thereby emphasizes how societal pressures, ideology, and self-interest collectively suppress empathy, and it asks viewers to reflect on the personal and collective cost of such detachment.
Comment