Trending >

Wood-burning stoves and fireplaces increase your risk of heart attack, Canadian study

wood stove heart attack

wood stove heart attack A new study from McGill University finds that for elderly people living in Canada’s small cities and towns, the risk of acute myocardial infarction is increased by 19 per cent by wood-burning stoves.

Smog warnings are seemingly a fact of life in big cities like Montreal, especially on cold winter days when more residents are burning wood in fireplaces and stoves. Environment Canada issued smog warnings in early January and mid-February of this year for Montreal and areas north and south of the city, citing poor air quality in large part due to fine particulate matter from wood stoves.

Montreal is taking steps to clean up the problem, however, adopting a plan for stricter air-pollution regulations, including a requirement that residents register their wood-burning fireplaces and stoves and then, by October 1, 2018, to have them replaced with stoves meeting stricter emissions standards.

But air quality problems due to wood burning are an issue in smaller cities and towns, too. New research led by Scott Weichenthal of the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health at McGill looked at the link between short-term changes in ambient fine particulate matter within three small cities in BC, Prince George, Kamloops and Courtenay/Comox and the rate of hospital admissions for heart attack among elderly residents.

While previous research has shown wood and biomass burning to be associated with increased inflammation, increased arterial stiffness and decreased heart rate variability, the new research draws a line specifically between wood burning and heart attack. The researchers found that during cold months when wood stoves and fireplaces are most in use, the risk of heart attack among residents aged 65 and higher increased by 19 per cent.

“We noticed that the association was stronger when more of the air pollution came from wood burning,” says Weichenthal in a press release. “This suggests that the source of pollution matters and that all particulate air pollution is perhaps not equally harmful when it comes to cardiovascular disease.”

Weichenthal hopes that in the interest of public health, municipalities small and large across the country take heed of the message and adopt tougher regulations for wood burning.

Across Canada, various municipalities are already taking steps in that direction. In Halifax, a citizen-submitted petition has recently sparked city council to look into new rules for wood burning stoves and fireplaces. In the city of Port Alberni on Vancouver Island, government officials have recently set emission standards for wood smoke, requiring all home wood stoves to be up to snuff. And in central Canada, the province of Ontario earmarked $400 million in its budget last year for a program to replace old wood stoves with more high efficiency stoves.

But leaving the regulating up to regional municipalities may not be the best approach. As reported by the Globe and Mail, the United States requires that the manufacture and sale of all wood-burning fireplaces and stoves be governed by standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency, while in Canada, no such nationwide requirements are in place. Here, the Canadian Safety Association (CSA) only sets voluntary guidelines, giving homeowners the option to purchase less efficient (and cheaper) stoves if they so choose and ultimately putting the burden on municipalities to set their own regulations.

  • 118
  •  
  •  

About The Author /

Jayson is a writer, researcher and educator with a PhD in political philosophy from the University of Ottawa. His interests range from bioethics and innovations in the health sciences to governance, social justice and the history of ideas.

Comment

  1. Ironically, the coldest city (Prince George) is also the cleanest and healthiest!

    The woodsmoke program in Launceston, Tasmania, reduced deaths in winter from respiratory disease by 28% and cardiovascular disease by 20%. Year round, for men, the reductions were 23% (respiratory), 18% (cardiovascular) and 11.4% (all deaths).

    Efficient heater-air-conditioners are cheaper than wood stoves and have lower running costs than buying firewood. Isn’t it time to Courtenay/Comox residents were allowed to enjoy the significant reductions in heart attacks, strokes and lung diseases that would come from phasing out woodstoves over the next 10 years?

  2. Prince George has historically had such bad air episodes that many people are now respectful of clean air … there are a few wood burning bullies still around … but most people are considerate and have butted out with the wood smoke. Save it for out in the bush where it doesn’t bother others …. global warming with carbon particles is another story however … Best to just show respect for others and the environment and let things rot into soil over time.

  3. The article is spot on for most points. The last paragraph however states it is up to the municipalities to set requirements for the manufacture and sale of wood stoves. In BC at least, the province, not the municipalities, regulate what emissions standards wood stoves must meet (which is EPA standards) to be sold in the province.

    However, this is pretty much all the province does — and it needs to do much more. At the municipal level it is a hodgepodge. For example, while Port Alberni requires the decommissioning of all old stoves and fireplaces, Courtenay still allows the installation of an open burning fireplace (which emits far more fine particulates than any wood stove) or a even a second hand uncertified stove. The community of Parksville has bylaws banning wood burning during an air quality advisory; but in the Comox Valley, where we have many more advisories, there is no such ban in any of the 3 municipalities in the region.

    These are just two examples of many. The province needs to show leadership and set minimum standards aimed at reducing the amount of wood smoke in municipalities and other areas. Citizens at the local level shouldn’t have to fight this battle one community at a time and end up with a variety of approaches (including complete inaction). As with smoking in restaurants and bars, the province (or perhaps the federal government if they have the jurisdiction) needs to set the standard.

  4. Jennell the City of Parksville does NOT enforce this By Law nor the Nuisance Wood Smoke Bylaw the City’s policy is that it is up to individuals affected to use the courts, In other words Parksville has no regulations pertaining to wood smoke so yes this needs to be dealt with Provincially to protect every ones health.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RELATED POSTS