All posts

Routine testing for prostate cancer could be harmful, study finds

Is your prostate exam harmful? A new review of the evidence on screening for prostate cancer has found that for most men, the potential harms outweigh the gains, leading to the recommendation that routine testing should be avoided.

The study, published in the scientific journal BMJ looked at five randomized controlled trials involving more than 721,000 men and concluded that, at best, screening for prostate cancer via the prostate-specific antigen test (PSA) leads to a small reduction in disease-specific mortality over ten years but has no effect on overall mortality.

“Clinicians and patients considering PSA-based screening need to weigh these benefits against the potential short and long term harms of screening, including complications from biopsies and subsequent treatment, as well as the risk of over-diagnosis and over-treatment,” say the study’s authors, who advise that men at higher risk of prostate cancer death, due to family history or certain genetic traits, for example, may be more likely to choose PSA testing having discussed the issue with their doctor.

Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer among Canadian men aside from non-melanoma skin cancers, according to the Canadian Cancer Society, which reports that in 2017, 21,300 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 4,100 men died of the disease, representing ten per cent of all cancer deaths in men for 2017.

Is your prostate exam harmful?

The most common test for prostate cancer is the PSA, which measures tissue inflammation yet can sometimes result in false positives, as reasons other than cancer (infection or normal enlargement of the prostate with age, for example) can produce a positive result.

Once a positive test has been produced, a biopsy often follows, which brings with it its own set of potential risks such as bleeding, infection and urinary incontinence. The issue is further complicated by the fact that for most men with prostate cancer, the tumour grows at such a slow pace that they’re more likely to die of other causes before symptoms of the cancer arise.

In 2014, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care reviewed the evidence and international best practices and concluded that for men under the age of 55 and over age 70 the PSA should not be used, while for men between 55 and 69, the recommendation was also to not screen but that physicians should discuss the potential benefits and harms of the test with their patients.

“Available evidence does not conclusively show that PSA screening will reduce prostate cancer mortality, but it clearly shows an elevated risk of harm. The task force recommends that the PSA test should not be used to screen for prostate cancer,” said Dr. Neil Bell, chair of the prostate cancer guideline working group of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

The BMJ study concluded that screening of lower risk patients resulted in one less death from prostate cancer per 1000 men screened over ten years, while biopsy and treatment were estimated to result in one more out of 1000 men hospitalized for sepsis, three more requiring pads for incontinence and 25 more reporting erectile dysfunction.

More from Jayson MacLean

We Hate Paywalls Too!

At Cantech Letter we prize independent journalism like you do. And we don't care for paywalls and popups and all that noise That's why we need your support. If you value getting your daily information from the experts, won't you help us? No donation is too small.

Make a one-time or recurring donation

Jayson MacLean

Jayson is a writer, researcher and educator with a PhD in political philosophy from the University of Ottawa. His interests range from bioethics and innovations in the health sciences to governance, social justice and the history of ideas.

Recent Posts

EGLX has price target slashed at Haywood

Following the company's first quarter results, Haywood analyst Gianluca Tucci has cut his price target on Enthusiast Gaming (Enthusiast Gaming… [Read More]

1 day ago

Is Dexterra Group a buy?

Its first quarter results are in the books and Beacon analyst Kirk Wilson has lowered his price target on Dexterra… [Read More]

2 days ago

Is AYR stock a buy?

Following the company's first quarter results, Beacon analyst Russell Stanley has maintained his "Buy" rating on Ayr Wellness (Ayr Wellness… [Read More]

2 days ago

Cresco Labs earns target raise at Echelon

Following the company's first quarter results, Echelon Capital Markets analyst Andrew Semple has raised his price target on Cresco Labs… [Read More]

2 days ago

SSTI is a buy, Roth says

Its first quarter results are in the book and Roth MKM analyst Richard K Baldry is still bullish on SoundThinking… [Read More]

3 days ago

GLXY wins price target raise at ATB Capital

Following the company's first quarter results, ATB Capital Markets analyst Martin Toner has raised his price target on Galaxy Digital… [Read More]

3 days ago