People, not climate change, primary cause of fires like Fort McMurray: study

Landscape view of wildfire near Highway 63 in south Fort McMurray.

In light of the recent and ongoing damage caused by a wildfire in and around Fort McMurray, Alberta, experts and laypersons alike are wondering about the potential role played by climate change in the onset and growth of this as well as other wildfires to come. Turns out, the cause of fires like the devastating Fort McMurray fire are more likely from people, not climate change.

And while many models are predicting that the warm, dry weather associated with climate change will lead to more frequent and more costly wildfires, what’s been ignored within these models has been the human factor.

That is, according to a research team led by Dr. Michael L. Mann, of the Department of Geography at the George Washington University in Washington, DC, whose recent study argues that in creating predictive models for wildfires within the state of California, scientists have consistently neglected to incorporate variables such as housing density, proximity of development to forestland, water usage and public land management practices, all of which are crucial, the researchers say, to clear and accurate modeling of wildfires.

“Although a number of statistical and process-based wildfire models exist for California, there is enormous uncertainty about the location and number of future fires. Previous findings of substantially increased numbers of fires and burned area for California may be tied to omitted variable bias from the exclusion of human influences,” say the study’s authors.

Wildfires are a huge problem in California, the most populous state in the U.S., with estimates on the annual cost of fires within the State Responsibility Areas – those lands where the state government is financially responsible for fire prevention and suppression -at $160.3 million (USD), along with an overall total of $5.18-billion spent on wildfire suppression between the years 1999 and 2011. Moreover, a whopping 95 per cent of fires in California are human caused.

Researchers ague that the building of new housing in or near natural vegetation plays a key role. These areas, termed wildland-urban interface (WUI) areas account for a majority of new housing in some parts of the state, such as in San Diego County where three of every four homes have been built in WUI areas.

Having included these human-centred factors on WUI housing development and density into their model, researchers were able to go back over the past 40 years of data and “predict” the occurrence of past fires much more accurately than when the human-centred factors were excluded. “Our model is able to successfully replicate the distribution of observed fires as well as some of their spatiotemporal dynamics across California,” says the study’s authors.

Importantly, the researchers argue that without properly including the dynamics of human settlement, wildfire modeling is likely to consistently overemphasize the role played by climate change. “Our findings evidence that the failure to include anthropogenic effects in future fire estimates may be significantly overstating the response of wildfire to climatic change alone,” say the study’s authors.

Thus, what are the new model’s predictions for the next 30 to 40 years in California? It’s a mixed bag. Climate change, human settlement dynamics and topographical variations across the state will figure into likely declines in future wildfires for some areas such as the central and north coastal regions, but in others, particularly the high elevation regions such as the Sierra Nevada, increases in the frequency of wildfires are expected.

More Cantech Science

We Hate Paywalls Too!

At Cantech Letter we prize independent journalism like you do. And we don't care for paywalls and popups and all that noise That's why we need your support. If you value getting your daily information from the experts, won't you help us? No donation is too small.

Make a one-time or recurring donation

Jayson MacLean

Jayson is a writer, researcher and educator with a PhD in political philosophy from the University of Ottawa. His interests range from bioethics and innovations in the health sciences to governance, social justice and the history of ideas.

View Comments

Recent Posts

Is Magellan Aerospace stock a buy?

Its first quarter results are in the books and Paradigm Capital analyst J Marvin Wolff thinks there is money to… [Read More]

1 hour ago

Phunware is undervalued, Roth says

Ahead of the company's first quarter results, Roth MKM analyst Darren Aftahi thinks there is money to be made on… [Read More]

3 hours ago

Héroux-Devtek is a buy, Desjardins says

Ahead of the company's quarterly results, Desjardins Securities analyst Benoit Poirier likes what he sees from Héroux-Devtek (Héroux-Devtek Stock Quote,… [Read More]

4 hours ago

JUSH stock is a buy, Beacon says

With its first quarter results on deck, Beacon Securities analyst Russell Stanley thinks Jushi Holdings (Jushi Holdings Stock Quote, Chart,… [Read More]

23 hours ago

Is Curaleaf stock still a buy?

The stock has been a steady climber since last October, but ahead of earnings is Curaleaf (Curaleaf Stock Quote, Chart,… [Read More]

1 day ago

OpenText price target cut at National Bank

Following third quarter results he describes as "in-line", National Bank Financial analyst Richard Tse has cut his price target on… [Read More]

1 day ago