Categories: All postsScience

Study of Canadian and Japanese children finds parents, not culture, is dominant influence

A new joint study from researchers at the University of Alberta and the University of Wisconsin looks at how cultural differences affect the way children of different backgrounds perceive the world around them. The research compared the descriptive tendencies of Canadian and Japanese children aged four to nine in order to track differences in perception and cognition based on cultural influence. And, not surprisingly, it turns out that parents play a dominant role in perpetuating culture-based frameworks for taking in and describing the world.

Researchers have known for some time that culture affects how we observe and even what we pay attention to. One fundamental difference stems from whether the focus of attention is centralized or contextual – for example, when American and Japanese undergraduates were asked to describe a short video sequence depicting an underwater scene, the American students had a greater tendency to talk about the large fish in the centre of the frame whereas the Japanese students had a greater tendency to talk about the context of the scene itself (the water, the environment surrounding the fish, etc.)

Another difference hinges on the stories we come up with to explain events -one study showed that Indian children were found to more often refer to external factors such as social constraints as causes whereas American children more often referred to internal factors such as an individual’s personality.

Canadian 7- to 9-year-olds were more likely than Japanese children to discuss focal objects, while Japanese 7- to 9-year-olds were more likely than Canadian children to discuss contextual information.

And researchers in developmental psychology know that as children grow and develop, these cultural variations in attention get built up over time. The current study gives insight into how and when this process occurs, by looking at interactions between parents and children and how children mimic parents’ observations and explanations.

“Our main goal was to investigate how parents communicate to their children in culturally dominant modes of attention before their children demonstrate a stabilized internalization of such culturally unique patterns of attention,” said the study’s authors.

The study recruited 70 Canadian children from Edmonton, Alberta, and 71 children from Kyoto and Tokyo and asked them to describe scenes on video terminals, first on their own and then with the help of their parent(s). The results showed that when working independently, the children did not show marked cultural differences in how they described the scenes but that when accompanied by their parents, the children produced more culturally varied scene descriptions.

Further, these differences became more pronounced as the age of the child increased between four to nine.

“Mirroring their parents’ guidance,” the study’s authors said, “Canadian 7- to 9-year-olds were more likely than Japanese children to discuss focal objects, while Japanese 7- to 9-year-olds were more likely than Canadian children to discuss contextual information.”

The authors see this as a form of cultural transmission and say that future studies should focus on identifying sources of transmission other than parents, such as peer groups, teachers and siblings.

The study was published this month online in the journal PLoS One.

More Cantech Science

We Hate Paywalls Too!

At Cantech Letter we prize independent journalism like you do. And we don't care for paywalls and popups and all that noise That's why we need your support. If you value getting your daily information from the experts, won't you help us? No donation is too small.

Make a one-time or recurring donation

Jayson MacLean

Jayson is a writer, researcher and educator with a PhD in political philosophy from the University of Ottawa. His interests range from bioethics and innovations in the health sciences to governance, social justice and the history of ideas.

Recent Posts

Is GOOGL still a buy?

Following a widely applauded first quarter beat, Roth MKM analyst Rohit Kulkarni has maintained his "Buy" rating on Alphabet (Alphabet… [Read More]

10 hours ago

NLH has 173% upside, Echelon says

Following an acquisition, Echelon Capital Markets analyst Stefan Quenneville has maintained his "Buy" rating on Nova Leap Health (Nova Leap… [Read More]

11 hours ago

Shopify upgraded to “Buy” at Citi

The stock has been flat since November, but Citi analyst Tyler Radke thinks there is now money to be made… [Read More]

11 hours ago

Sabio has 400% upside, Eight Capital says

Following the company's fourth quarter results, Eight Capital analyst Kiran Sritharan has maintained his "Buy" rating on Sabio Holdings (Sabio… [Read More]

3 days ago

Is SNAP a buy right now?

He feels the company made forward progress in its recent quarterly results, but Roth MKM analyst Rohit Kulkarni wants to… [Read More]

3 days ago

Bombardier wins price target raise at Desjardins

Following the company's first quarter results, Desjardins analyst Benoit Poirier has raised his price target on Bombardier (Bombardier Stock Quote,… [Read More]

3 days ago