When things do go wrong, the finger of blame is usually pointed at its management team and at the senior member of that team in particular. He or she will be referred to as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in this article. It seldom gets pointed at the board of directors to whom the CEO reports.
One of the reasons for this oversight, particularly in the high technology industry, where detailed industry knowledge is an asset, is that this knowledge is often difficult to acquire. The problem is often worsened by the practice of appointing directors for their “window dressing” value as opposed to their value as corporate governors.
The building of a good board is not a trivial task. The first question that typically gets asked about appointing the first slate of directors is “When is an outside board needed?” The answer to that is the minute that the company accepts investment capital from someone other than the founders. The second question is “What does a board do?” It can (and should) do things like mentor the CEO, approve an annually updated strategic plan that extends at least three years into the future, approve a one year operational plan and ensure that there is a rigorous forecasting system in place that alerts the senior management team to possible performance problems.
The third question typically refers to the makeup of the board. Board members should have a diversity of skills similar to those required in the company’s management team, usually Sales/Marketing, Research and Development, Operations, and Finance and Administration.
There are many more questions that should be answered about boards and the governance that they should provide on behalf of company stakeholders, but the key one is “Does Canada have the appropriate pool of board talent to grow a world class high technology industry?” We talk a great deal about a skills shortage in the industry, but seldom does the discussion ever extend to the director level. If we were really honest about the situation, we would have to admit that we have too much window dressing and not enough results-oriented governance.
And while we are assessing the situation, we might remind ourselves that Steve Jobs was a strong believer in having a good board that understood the challenges and the opportunities that he faced. Last time I checked it worked out pretty well for shareholders of Apple
Research Capital Corporation analyst Greg McLeish maintained his “Buy” rating and $3.50 target on Cannara Biotech (Cannara Biotech Stock Quote,… [Read More]
Propellus Wealth Partners portfolio manager and senior wealth advisor Mike Vinokur says Amazon (Amazon.com Stock Quote, Chart, News, Analysts, Financials… [Read More]
Clarus Securities analyst Noel Atkinson reiterated his “Speculative Buy” rating and $0.30 target on AmeriTrust Financial Technologies (AmeriTrust Financial Technologies… [Read More]
Murray Wealth Group CEO and CIO Bruce Murray says Nvidia (Nvidia Stock Quote, Chart, News, Analysts, Financials NASDAQ:NVDA) remains a… [Read More]
Beacon Securities analyst Gabriel Leung is keeping his eye on IC Group Holdings saying the company offers exposure to consumer… [Read More]
Haywood Securities analyst Neal Gilmer says lower Canadian cannabis market share is weighing on Tilray Brands (Tilray Brands Stock Quote,… [Read More]